Image 1 of 1
Image 1 of 1
Image 1 of 1
Image 1 of 1
The Supreme Court's decision in Chatrie v. United States will be the most consequential Fourth Amendment ruling on digital surveillance in years — and it directly affects how your agency investigates crime, builds probable cause, and defends evidence at suppression hearings.
We believe that transforming understanding into action starts with access. When the Supreme Court issues a decision of this magnitude, Shield Public Safety Training will not stand on the sidelines and charge admission.
In Chatrie, the Court will address, for the first time, whether a geofence warrant — a court order directing Google to identify every cell phone near a crime scene during a specific time window — constitutes an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment. The answer will reshape how law enforcement uses location data, how investigators construct geofence warrant applications, and how agencies respond when that evidence is challenged in court.
In this free, one-hour webinar, Shield PST Founder and President James "Jeb" Brown, Esq. — a Police Legal Advisor and seasoned §1983 defense counsel — will break down:
What the Court decided and why it matters for your agency right now
The Fourth Amendment framework going forward for geofence warrant applications
The third-party doctrine after Carpenter — and exactly where Chatrie fits
Probable cause and particularity requirements under the new constitutional standard
Practical implications for investigators, agency counsel, and command staff
Whether your agency uses geofence warrants regularly or has never applied for one, Chatrie will set the constitutional rules of the road for digital location surveillance. This is the ruling your agency cannot afford to misunderstand.
Space is limited. Registration is free. Secure your spot now.
The Supreme Court's decision in Chatrie v. United States will be the most consequential Fourth Amendment ruling on digital surveillance in years — and it directly affects how your agency investigates crime, builds probable cause, and defends evidence at suppression hearings.
We believe that transforming understanding into action starts with access. When the Supreme Court issues a decision of this magnitude, Shield Public Safety Training will not stand on the sidelines and charge admission.
In Chatrie, the Court will address, for the first time, whether a geofence warrant — a court order directing Google to identify every cell phone near a crime scene during a specific time window — constitutes an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment. The answer will reshape how law enforcement uses location data, how investigators construct geofence warrant applications, and how agencies respond when that evidence is challenged in court.
In this free, one-hour webinar, Shield PST Founder and President James "Jeb" Brown, Esq. — a Police Legal Advisor and seasoned §1983 defense counsel — will break down:
What the Court decided and why it matters for your agency right now
The Fourth Amendment framework going forward for geofence warrant applications
The third-party doctrine after Carpenter — and exactly where Chatrie fits
Probable cause and particularity requirements under the new constitutional standard
Practical implications for investigators, agency counsel, and command staff
Whether your agency uses geofence warrants regularly or has never applied for one, Chatrie will set the constitutional rules of the road for digital location surveillance. This is the ruling your agency cannot afford to misunderstand.
Space is limited. Registration is free. Secure your spot now.